From: "Daniel M. Zimmerman dmz@tffenterprises.com" <cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [CGPSA] CGPSA on Debian 12 with CGP SPEC 8.0.5
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:12:23 +0800
Message-Id: <3D214C20-969E-4464-A5A7-BA67F088D408@tffenterprises.com>
References: <3CED846A-E432-437F-BE19-9302CE95010B@tnt.be>
In-Reply-To: <3CED846A-E432-437F-BE19-9302CE95010B@tnt.be>
To: CGPSA Discussion List <cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com>

It=E2=80=99s unclear to me why the older SpamAssassin would have changed the=
 ruleset it was using. What I=E2=80=99d probably try would be:

1) see what happens if you tell CGPSA to use the newer Perl (and newer SpamA=
ssassin) instead; if it works, you=E2=80=99re set, and if not, you can try=E2=
=80=A6

2) turn on verbose logging in CGPSA (see the config file) while it=E2=80=99s=
 still running the old SpamAssassin, so that you can see where it=E2=80=99s l=
oading the ruleset from.
=20
-Dan=20

Sent from mobile, please forgive spelling errors or brevity

> On Oct 28, 2024, at 03:28, Jona Tallieu (T & T nv) Junk@tnt.be <cgpsa-disc=
uss@mail.tffenterprises.com> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFThank you so much for your answer!
>=20
> I would not mind keep using SA 3.4.6 as long as it would use the ruleset I=
 collected and the whitelists I configured, which are located at cd /etc/spa=
massassin/.
> But since the OS update (and the included SA update) it seems it=E2=80=99s=
 using a default ruleset somewhere.
>=20
> Any way to force the SA 3.4.6 to use the original rules at /etc/spamassass=
in/ ?
>=20
> Thank you!
>=20
>=20
> J.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>> On 27 Oct 2024, at 08:15, Daniel M. Zimmerman dmz@tffenterprises.com <cgp=
sa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> Looking at what you=E2=80=99ve written here, my guess is that CGPSA and y=
our =E2=80=9Cspamassassin=E2=80=9D command line tool are using different Per=
l distributions (and therefore different SpamAssassin installations). Make s=
ure the =E2=80=9C#!/path/to/perl=E2=80=9D line at the top of the CGPSA scrip=
t has the full path to the Perl that your =E2=80=9Cspamassassin=E2=80=9D scr=
ipt is using (you can check the top of that script, or just use =E2=80=9Cwhi=
ch perl=E2=80=9D to find your system Perl, which I assume is where you=E2=80=
=99ve installed SpamAssassin 4).
>>=20
>> Note that I=E2=80=99ve only done very, very limited testing with CGPSA an=
d SpamAssassin 4; it may work fine, but there may be unforeseen issues.
>>=20
>> -Dan
>>=20
>> Sent from mobile, please forgive spelling errors or brevity
>>=20
>>>> On Oct 18, 2024, at 17:55, Jona Tallieu (T & T nv) Junk@tnt.be <cgpsa-d=
iscuss@mail.tffenterprises.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> =EF=BB=BFDear,
>>>=20
>>> It=E2=80=99s been running for a while, but CGPSA is not using the latest=
 installed spamassassin.
>>> And is not using the /etc/mail/spamassassin directory for the rules.
>>>=20
>>> spamassassin --version
>>> SpamAssassin version 4.0.0
>>> running on Perl version 5.36.0
>>>=20
>>> But in the cgpsa headers in an e-mail:
>>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SA 3.4.6
>>>=20
>>> I also see that whitelisted addresses:
>>> whitelist_from *@samsonite.com
>>> still get spam boxed=E2=80=A6
>>>=20
>>> Any ideas?
>>>=20
>>> Thank you!
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Best,
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Jona
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>> On 15 May 2024, at 23:07, Daniel M. Zimmerman dmz@tffenterprises.com <c=
gpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>> I=E2=80=99m unfamiliar with =E2=80=9CCGP SPEC=E2=80=9D, but I=E2=80=99m=
 assuming they haven=E2=80=99t changed anything in the CLI to break its comp=
atibility with previous versions of the CLI protocol, so from that perspecti=
ve it should probably work fine. Just be sure you have reasonable versions o=
f Perl and the other dependencies installed, and note that CGPSA has not bee=
n tested with SpamAssassin 4 (at least, not by me - if anybody else has, ple=
ase let me know).
>>>>=20
>>>> -Dan
>>>>=20
>>>>>> On May 14, 2024, at 01:18, Jona Tallieu (T & T nv) Junk@tnt.be <cgpsa=
-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com> wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Dear,
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Anyone running CGPSA on Debian 12 in combination with CGP SPEC 8.0.5?
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Should I expect problems when upgrading to this combo? Things I need t=
o know before?
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Jona
>>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> -----
>>>> This message is from the CGPSA Mailing List.
>>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <cgpsa-discuss-off@mail.tffenterprises.com>.=

>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> -----
>> This message is from the CGPSA Mailing List.
>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <cgpsa-discuss-off@mail.tffenterprises.com>.
>=20