X-Virus-Flag: No (epsilon3) From: "Jona Tallieu (T & T nv) Junk@tnt.be" Received: from mail.tnt.be ([188.93.103.100] verified) by mail.tffenterprises.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.15) with ESMTP id 23209882 for cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 12:36:32 -0700 Received-SPF: pass receiver=mail.tffenterprises.com; client-ip=188.93.103.100; envelope-from=Junk@tnt.be X-TNT-Attach: Scanned X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.23.2 (ClamAV engine v0.103.2) X-TNT-VirScan1: Scanned X-TNT-VirScan2: Scanned Received: from [91.177.93.117] (account junk@mail.tnt.be HELO smtpclient.apple) by mail.tnt.be (CommuniGate SPEC SMTP 8.0.5) with ESMTPA id 75018068 for cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 20:36:23 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3818.100.11.1.3\)) Subject: Re: [CGPSA] CGPSA on Debian 12 with CGP SPEC 8.0.5 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 20:36:13 +0100 References: To: CGPSA Discussion List In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <24551DDD-84D2-4734-B875-BB6C7F697049@tnt.be> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3818.100.11.1.3) Extra info: /etc/mail/spamassassin is already a symlink: /etc/mail/spamassassin -> ../spamassassin J. > On 27 Oct 2024, at 20:28, Jona Tallieu (T & T nv) Junk@tnt.be = wrote: >=20 > Thank you so much for your answer! >=20 > I would not mind keep using SA 3.4.6 as long as it would use the = ruleset I collected and the whitelists I configured, which are located = at cd /etc/spamassassin/. > But since the OS update (and the included SA update) it seems it=E2=80=99= s using a default ruleset somewhere. >=20 > Any way to force the SA 3.4.6 to use the original rules at = /etc/spamassassin/ ? >=20 > Thank you! >=20 >=20 > J. >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On 27 Oct 2024, at 08:15, Daniel M. Zimmerman dmz@tffenterprises.com = wrote: >>=20 >> Looking at what you=E2=80=99ve written here, my guess is that CGPSA = and your =E2=80=9Cspamassassin=E2=80=9D command line tool are using = different Perl distributions (and therefore different SpamAssassin = installations). Make sure the =E2=80=9C#!/path/to/perl=E2=80=9D line at = the top of the CGPSA script has the full path to the Perl that your = =E2=80=9Cspamassassin=E2=80=9D script is using (you can check the top of = that script, or just use =E2=80=9Cwhich perl=E2=80=9D to find your = system Perl, which I assume is where you=E2=80=99ve installed = SpamAssassin 4). >>=20 >> Note that I=E2=80=99ve only done very, very limited testing with = CGPSA and SpamAssassin 4; it may work fine, but there may be unforeseen = issues. >>=20 >> -Dan=20 >>=20 >> Sent from mobile, please forgive spelling errors or brevity >>=20 >>> On Oct 18, 2024, at 17:55, Jona Tallieu (T & T nv) Junk@tnt.be = wrote: >>>=20 >>> =EF=BB=BFDear, >>>=20 >>> It=E2=80=99s been running for a while, but CGPSA is not using the = latest installed spamassassin. >>> And is not using the /etc/mail/spamassassin directory for the rules. >>>=20 >>> spamassassin --version >>> SpamAssassin version 4.0.0 >>> running on Perl version 5.36.0 >>>=20 >>> But in the cgpsa headers in an e-mail: >>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SA 3.4.6 >>>=20 >>> I also see that whitelisted addresses: >>> whitelist_from *@samsonite.com >>> still get spam boxed=E2=80=A6 >>>=20 >>> Any ideas? >>>=20 >>> Thank you! >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Best, >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Jona >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> On 15 May 2024, at 23:07, Daniel M. Zimmerman = dmz@tffenterprises.com wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> I=E2=80=99m unfamiliar with =E2=80=9CCGP SPEC=E2=80=9D, but I=E2=80=99= m assuming they haven=E2=80=99t changed anything in the CLI to break its = compatibility with previous versions of the CLI protocol, so from that = perspective it should probably work fine. Just be sure you have = reasonable versions of Perl and the other dependencies installed, and = note that CGPSA has not been tested with SpamAssassin 4 (at least, not = by me - if anybody else has, please let me know). >>>>=20 >>>> -Dan >>>>=20 >>>>>> On May 14, 2024, at 01:18, Jona Tallieu (T & T nv) Junk@tnt.be = wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Dear, >>>>>=20 >>>>> Anyone running CGPSA on Debian 12 in combination with CGP SPEC = 8.0.5? >>>>>=20 >>>>> Should I expect problems when upgrading to this combo? Things I = need to know before? >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thank you! >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Best, >>>>>=20 >>>>> Jona >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> ----- >>>> This message is from the CGPSA Mailing List. >>>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: = . >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> ----- >> This message is from the CGPSA Mailing List. >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: = . >=20 >=20 > ----- > This message is from the CGPSA Mailing List. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: = .