From: "Daniel M. Zimmerman dmz@tffenterprises.com" <cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [CGPSA] CGPSA on Debian 12 with CGP SPEC 8.0.5
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 15:15:45 +0800
Message-Id: <160B3CB0-7928-4C3D-9A5B-1C7ABDD3F076@tffenterprises.com>
References: <6FEDA89B-40E3-47FD-8932-955E29514257@tnt.be>
In-Reply-To: <6FEDA89B-40E3-47FD-8932-955E29514257@tnt.be>
To: CGPSA Discussion List <cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com>

Looking at what you=E2=80=99ve written here, my guess is that CGPSA and your=
 =E2=80=9Cspamassassin=E2=80=9D command line tool are using different Perl d=
istributions (and therefore different SpamAssassin installations). Make sure=
 the =E2=80=9C#!/path/to/perl=E2=80=9D line at the top of the CGPSA script h=
as the full path to the Perl that your =E2=80=9Cspamassassin=E2=80=9D script=
 is using (you can check the top of that script, or just use =E2=80=9Cwhich p=
erl=E2=80=9D to find your system Perl, which I assume is where you=E2=80=99v=
e installed SpamAssassin 4).

Note that I=E2=80=99ve only done very, very limited testing with CGPSA and S=
pamAssassin 4; it may work fine, but there may be unforeseen issues.

-Dan=20

Sent from mobile, please forgive spelling errors or brevity

> On Oct 18, 2024, at 17:55, Jona Tallieu (T & T nv) Junk@tnt.be <cgpsa-disc=
uss@mail.tffenterprises.com> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFDear,
>=20
> It=E2=80=99s been running for a while, but CGPSA is not using the latest i=
nstalled spamassassin.
> And is not using the /etc/mail/spamassassin directory for the rules.
>=20
> spamassassin --version
> SpamAssassin version 4.0.0
> running on Perl version 5.36.0
>=20
> But in the cgpsa headers in an e-mail:
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SA 3.4.6
>=20
> I also see that whitelisted addresses:
> whitelist_from *@samsonite.com
> still get spam boxed=E2=80=A6
>=20
> Any ideas?
>=20
> Thank you!
>=20
>=20
> Best,
>=20
>=20
> Jona
>=20
>=20
>=20
>> On 15 May 2024, at 23:07, Daniel M. Zimmerman dmz@tffenterprises.com <cgp=
sa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> I=E2=80=99m unfamiliar with =E2=80=9CCGP SPEC=E2=80=9D, but I=E2=80=99m a=
ssuming they haven=E2=80=99t changed anything in the CLI to break its compat=
ibility with previous versions of the CLI protocol, so from that perspective=
 it should probably work fine. Just be sure you have reasonable versions of P=
erl and the other dependencies installed, and note that CGPSA has not been t=
ested with SpamAssassin 4 (at least, not by me - if anybody else has, please=
 let me know).
>>=20
>> -Dan
>>=20
>>>> On May 14, 2024, at 01:18, Jona Tallieu (T & T nv) Junk@tnt.be <cgpsa-d=
iscuss@mail.tffenterprises.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Dear,
>>>=20
>>> Anyone running CGPSA on Debian 12 in combination with CGP SPEC 8.0.5?
>>>=20
>>> Should I expect problems when upgrading to this combo? Things I need to k=
now before?
>>>=20
>>> Thank you!
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Best,
>>>=20
>>> Jona
>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> -----
>> This message is from the CGPSA Mailing List.
>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <cgpsa-discuss-off@mail.tffenterprises.com>.
>=20