From: "Palvelin Postmaster postmaster@palvelin.fi" Received: from posti.palvelin.fi ([83.150.109.27] verified) by mail.tffenterprises.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.7) with ESMTPS id 20040390 for cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:37:22 -0700 Received-SPF: pass receiver=mail.tffenterprises.com; client-ip=83.150.109.27; envelope-from=postmaster@palvelin.fi X-ClamAV-Checked: YES DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=palvelin.fi; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; s=posti; bh=Er2A1dVl aLOFvhrWkpKkvR2sg32jRp7mVBGQdLvg4/0=; b=FNqW0D8dItaTWMqm6pF1H3kb ikstcBxDDcCO7lvivsdyfy3iZud8OzfKbsu7aFTLNSulWQw1PWMwWFoSxYv3f83d yoMHWr6Xqmc2zWX9I278k2JMkYLrGKD5trPuD2eg1Bd14OUTvjlOiVlm0bAcUQ5V okVccEabYVnsSML3O94= Received: from [136.52.125.156] (account postmaster@palvelin.fi HELO [192.168.168.231]) by palvelin.fi (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.12) with ESMTPSA id 10633550 for cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:37:08 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: [CGPSA] Delivering spam to Junk mailbox of each recipient Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:37:04 -0700 References: To: CGPSA Discussion List In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <7ACF25F4-4AD4-49BE-BE6A-19F3A93CA2C8@palvelin.fi> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) That=E2=80=99s correct. The log entry looks like this: 02:21:08.018 2 DEQUEUER [10631102] = SYSTEM(name@domain.dom)#Junk-SpamAssassin delivered: delivered via = Automatic Rules If the mbox file didn=E2=80=99t exist yet, one appears. The mbox file = size stays at 0 bytes. > On 19 Jun 2019, at 9.30, Daniel M. Zimmerman dmz@tffenterprises.com = wrote: >=20 > That is odd=E2=80=A6 So the log is saying that the mail should be = delivered to the direct mailbox address, and the mailbox exists, but the = mail isn=E2=80=99t ending up there?=20 >=20 > -Dan >=20 >> On 14 Jun 2019, at 21:39, Palvelin Postmaster postmaster@palvelin.fi = wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>> On 28 May 2018, at 23.37, Patrick Sneyers = wrote: >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> Op 29 mei 2018, om 08:17 heeft Palvelin Postmaster = het volgende geschreven: >>>>=20 >>>> Hi, >>>>=20 >>>> I have a system-wide rule which delivers all recognized spam = addressed to all domains and recipients to one centralized spam folder = (of an account created exclusively for this purpose) for temporary = storage and teaching SpamAssassin=E2=80=99s bayes filter. >>>>=20 >>>> I=E2=80=99m considering changing my strategy to having a per-user = spam folder instead. I=E2=80=99m thinking this could, at the very least, = empower the users to actually receive these messages and manage possible = false positives. >>>>=20 >>>> Does anyone have any experience or insights about the strengths and = weaknesses of alternate handling strategies? >>>>=20 >>>> What would be the best way to implement this? Do I just need to = make a =E2=80=99Store In=E2=80=99 domain-wide rule for each domain = instead of the single system-wide rule I have now? >>>>=20 >>>> -- >>>> Palvelin.fi Hostmaster >>>> postmaster@palvelin.fi >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> You can use this option in cgpsa.conf (line 552 in my file), and = keep using the server wide rule. >>> Of course, learning spam/ham becomes a bit more complicated then. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> # A flag that determines whether messages tagged as spam will be = filed >>> # automatically using direct mailbox addressing. This eliminates the = need >>> # for users to add rules to their accounts to handle spam filtering, = but >>> # only works on systems where direct mailbox addressing is enabled. = If >>> # this setting is enabled, spam will be filed in the mailbox = specified by >>> # the "spam_mailbox_name" setting; the mailbox will be created when = needed >>> # if it does not exist. >>> # >>> use_dma_spam_mailbox =3D true >>>=20 >>> # The name of the mailbox to use for direct mailbox addressing when=20= >>> # the "use_dma_spam_mailbox" setting is enabled.=20 >>> # >>> spam_mailbox_name =3D Junk >>=20 >> I=E2=80=99m now testing this. For some reason, my Junk mailboxes = remain empty even though CGP log indicates mail should end there and the = junk mailbox mbox files got created. I wonder what could be wrong? I = have direct mailbox routing enabled. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 > --- > Daniel M. Zimmerman > http://www.tffenterprises.com/~dmz/ >=20 >=20 > ----- > This message is from the CGPSA Mailing List. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: = .