From: "Daniel M. Zimmerman dmz@tffenterprises.com" Received: from [65.100.53.74] (account dmz@mail.tffenterprises.com HELO drala-fi.galois.com) by mail.tffenterprises.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.7) with ESMTPSA id 20039772 for cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:30:40 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: [CGPSA] Delivering spam to Junk mailbox of each recipient Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:30:40 -0700 References: To: "Palvelin Postmaster postmaster@palvelin.fi" In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) That is odd=E2=80=A6 So the log is saying that the mail should be = delivered to the direct mailbox address, and the mailbox exists, but the = mail isn=E2=80=99t ending up there?=20 -Dan > On 14 Jun 2019, at 21:39, Palvelin Postmaster postmaster@palvelin.fi = wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On 28 May 2018, at 23.37, Patrick Sneyers = wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>> Op 29 mei 2018, om 08:17 heeft Palvelin Postmaster = het volgende geschreven: >>>=20 >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> I have a system-wide rule which delivers all recognized spam = addressed to all domains and recipients to one centralized spam folder = (of an account created exclusively for this purpose) for temporary = storage and teaching SpamAssassin=E2=80=99s bayes filter. >>>=20 >>> I=E2=80=99m considering changing my strategy to having a per-user = spam folder instead. I=E2=80=99m thinking this could, at the very least, = empower the users to actually receive these messages and manage possible = false positives. >>>=20 >>> Does anyone have any experience or insights about the strengths and = weaknesses of alternate handling strategies? >>>=20 >>> What would be the best way to implement this? Do I just need to make = a =E2=80=99Store In=E2=80=99 domain-wide rule for each domain instead of = the single system-wide rule I have now? >>>=20 >>> -- >>> Palvelin.fi Hostmaster >>> postmaster@palvelin.fi >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> You can use this option in cgpsa.conf (line 552 in my file), and keep = using the server wide rule. >> Of course, learning spam/ham becomes a bit more complicated then. >>=20 >>=20 >> # A flag that determines whether messages tagged as spam will be = filed >> # automatically using direct mailbox addressing. This eliminates the = need >> # for users to add rules to their accounts to handle spam filtering, = but >> # only works on systems where direct mailbox addressing is enabled. = If >> # this setting is enabled, spam will be filed in the mailbox = specified by >> # the "spam_mailbox_name" setting; the mailbox will be created when = needed >> # if it does not exist. >> # >> use_dma_spam_mailbox =3D true >>=20 >> # The name of the mailbox to use for direct mailbox addressing when=20= >> # the "use_dma_spam_mailbox" setting is enabled.=20 >> # >> spam_mailbox_name =3D Junk >=20 > I=E2=80=99m now testing this. For some reason, my Junk mailboxes = remain empty even though CGP log indicates mail should end there and the = junk mailbox mbox files got created. I wonder what could be wrong? I = have direct mailbox routing enabled. >=20 >=20 >=20 --- Daniel M. Zimmerman http://www.tffenterprises.com/~dmz/