Return-Path: Received: from [83.164.197.122] (HELO ergonis.com) by mail.tffenterprises.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.7) with ESMTP id 19185984 for cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:48:41 -0800 Received-SPF: pass receiver=mail.tffenterprises.com; client-ip=83.164.197.122; envelope-from=chrei-list@ergonis.com Received: from [86.56.175.105] (account chrei@ergonis.com HELO [192.168.122.22]) by ergonis.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.11) with ESMTPSA id 28396765 for cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:48:20 +0100 From: Christoph Reichenberger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: [CGPSA] Test Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:48:20 +0100 References: To: CGPSA Discussion List In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Yes, I would love to see a more recent SpamAssassin release. Here, the network rules are on (URIBL, SBL, Razor2,...) are not working properly, and without these rules, bayes alone doesn't suffice. Does anybody know about tips how to find out why the network based rules don=E2=80=99t work and how to make them work? Thanks Christoph > On 28 Nov 2017, at 08:02, Daniel M. Zimmerman = wrote: >=20 > Wow, I=E2=80=99m glad to see so many people still using CGPSA. I = obviously haven=E2=80=99t had much time to work on it in the last, well, = long time, but apparently it hasn=E2=80=99t really needed it. :) >=20 > I do wish SpamAssassin updates were more frequent, though. If anybody = has specific rulesets, update sites, blacklists, etc., that have been = working well for them, I=E2=80=99d love to hear about them. >=20 > -Dan Zimmerman >=20 >=20 > ----- > This message is from the CGPSA Mailing List. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: = . Christoph Reichenberger chrei-list@ergonis.com