Return-Path: <dmz@tffenterprises.com>
Received: from [207.47.24.11] (account dmz@mail.tffenterprises.com HELO [172.20.0.251])
  by mail.tffenterprises.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.7)
  with ESMTPSA id 19185905 for cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 23:02:28 -0800
From: "Daniel M. Zimmerman" <dmz@tffenterprises.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Subject: Re: [CGPSA] Test
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 23:02:26 -0800
References: <list-19178806@mail.tffenterprises.com>
 <ef11b00e-b8dd-56fb-9fd7-776dc5e5eef1@henryg.net>
To: CGPSA Discussion List <cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com>
In-Reply-To: <ef11b00e-b8dd-56fb-9fd7-776dc5e5eef1@henryg.net>
Message-Id: <E9BB14E4-F309-4D40-9A7E-67A0A692C232@tffenterprises.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)

Wow, I=E2=80=99m glad to see so many people still using CGPSA. I =
obviously haven=E2=80=99t had much time to work on it in the last, well, =
long time, but apparently it hasn=E2=80=99t really needed it. :)

I do wish SpamAssassin updates were more frequent, though. If anybody =
has specific rulesets, update sites, blacklists, etc., that have been =
working well for them, I=E2=80=99d love to hear about them.

-Dan Zimmerman