Return-Path: Received: from [173.51.95.94] (account dmz@mail.tffenterprises.com HELO [192.168.27.102]) by mail.tffenterprises.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0) with ESMTPSA id 16171642 for cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:42:28 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: Problems between CGPSA 1.71 and CGP 6.0.8 From: "Daniel M. Zimmerman" In-Reply-To: <52DCCEF9.3040007@redco.com.au> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:42:25 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8F9821CD-B816-4E62-A0CF-B1D47C54A2B7@tffenterprises.com> References: <52DCCEF9.3040007@redco.com.au> To: CGPSA Discussion List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) On 19 Jan 2014, at 23:23, Shaun Gamble wrote: > Is anyone else experiencing problems with CGPSA as a helper on Windows = servers? >=20 > I am running CGP 6.0.8 x64 on a Windows 2012 server. I have been = running CGPSA for years. Originally on a Windows 2003 server and then I = moved it to a newer 2012 server about a year ago. The only thing that = has changed is the upgrade from CGP5 to CGP6. >=20 > CGPSA actually works fine for a while and then just seems to stop. = What I think is happening is the automatic restart helper is kicking in = (config in CGPSA) and once this happens CGP seems to throw a tantrum. = You cannot disable the helper in CGP as it just reports it is unable to = kill the helper. If you stop waiting and change to another webadmin page = (say monitor instead of settings) and go back to the helpers page, the = helper is then showing as disabled. Mail will then flow freely again. = Obviously mail is flowing but the helper is disabled still. >=20 > Any ideas? You could try disabling the automatic restart part of CGPSA = (max_requests =3D 0) and see how it behaves. It is possible that newer = versions of SpamAssassin have fixed the memory leaks that the = max_requests feature was introduced to prevent. It is also possible, = though perhaps not likely, that parallel_requests would work with Win32 = now given that progress must have been made with respect to Perl's = emulation of fork().=20 -Dan --- Daniel M. Zimmerman http://www.tffenterprises.com/~dmz/