Return-Path: Received: from mail.kindsoftware.com ([131.174.33.98] verified) by mail.tffenterprises.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.7) with ESMTP-TLS id 6869069 for cgpsa-discuss@tff.cs.caltech.edu; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:00:00 -0800 Received: from ised.org ([66.133.81.240] verified) by mail.kindsoftware.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 1229267 for cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:59:58 +0100 Received: from [66.133.81.254] (account tschuldt HELO 19v8p01) by ised.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 53907 for cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:59:56 -0600 From: "Todd Schuldt" To: "'CGPSA Discussion List'" Subject: RE: [CGPSA] Good Scan Rate Average Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:59:57 -0600 Organization: Institute for Social and Economic Development Message-ID: <003601c3afba$049ef510$fe518542@ised.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal 30 seconds? Sounds like you have the OsiruSoft blacklist checks still active in 2.55. For me on SA 2.6/CGPSA 1.2.3, SuSE 9.0, P3-braindead slot 1 cpu and = 640mb mem raid 5: 01:46:34.87 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(64): * 996 Identified non-spam = (4.4/5.0) for in 1.9 seconds 01:52:57.53 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(65): * 997 Identified non-spam = (-4.9/5.0) for in 0.5 seconds 01:54:16.35 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(60): * 998 Identified spam (7.0/5.0) = for in 1.4 seconds 01:59:21.76 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(60): * 999 Identified spam (5.8/5.0) = for in 1.8 seconds 02:01:37.03 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(65): * 1000 Identified non-spam = (2.2/5.0) for in 2.0 seconds 02:04:11.20 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(65): * 1001 Identified non-spam = (4.9/5.0) for in 2.2 seconds 02:09:12.16 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(65): * 1002 Identified non-spam = (3.7/5.0) for in 1.2 seconds Todd -----Original Message----- From: CGPSA Discussion List = [mailto:cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com] On Behalf Of bbeers Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:50 PM To: CGPSA Discussion List Subject: [CGPSA] Good Scan Rate Average Hi, Can someone please tell me what a good scan rate average would be? =20 According to my logs it shows us sitting at around 31 to 32 seconds per=20 scan: 16:36:41.39 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(66): * 1534 Identified non-spam=20 (0.9/4.5) for in 31.0 seconds 16:37:13.30 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(69): * 1535 Identified non-spam=20 (-102.8/4.5) for in 32.0 seconds 16:37:45.09 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(63): * 1536 Identified spam=20 (12.5/4.5) for in 32.0 seconds Seems maybe a bit high to me, but I am new to this setup. If this is=20 high, what (if anything) can I do to drop the scan time? We're running=20 OS X 10.2, CGPSA 1.2, SpamAssassin 2.55, CGPro 4.1. Many thanks in advance for any help, advice, etc. Brian ----- This message is from the CGPSA Mailing List. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: .