Return-Path: <stuart.mycock@sportnewspapers.co.uk>
Received: from mail.kindsoftware.com ([131.174.33.98] verified)
  by mail.tffenterprises.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.7)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 6868936 for cgpsa-discuss@tff.cs.caltech.edu; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:04:04 -0800
Received: from pengo.systems.pipex.net ([62.241.160.193] verified)
  by mail.kindsoftware.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6)
  with ESMTP id 1229136 for cgpsa-discuss@tffenterprises.com; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:04:02 +0100
Received: from sneef (81-86-118-144.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.118.144])
	by pengo.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id DB0094C00054
	for <cgpsa-discuss@tffenterprises.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:03:59 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Stuart Mycock" <stuart.mycock@sportnewspapers.co.uk>
To: "CGPSA Discussion List" <cgpsa-discuss@tffenterprises.com>
Subject: RE: [CGPSA] Good Scan Rate Average
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:04:11 -0000
Message-ID: <LOBBLHHBJBIENFKNFHIMIEJMEIAA.stuart.mycock@sportnewspapers.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <list-6868894@mail.tffenterprises.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106


> Can someone please tell me what a good scan rate average would be?
> According to my logs it shows us sitting at around 31 to 32 seconds per
> scan:

On i386 arch we get on average 0.2 seconds scan time, that's on a PIII 1GHz,
512Mb, RH73 (kernel 2.20), SA 2.6, CGP 4.1.5, Perl 5.6.0, CGPSA 1.2.3.

On a G4 running OSX I would've thought it would be a similar speed, I
suspect your Perl may have something to do with it... also, does "All info"
log level show more about what's going on?

> 16:37:13.30 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(69): * 1535 Identified non-spam
> (-102.8/4.5) for <default> in 32.0 seconds

Just out of curiosity, what message was this that scored -102.8?

Stu.