Return-Path: Received: from mail.kindsoftware.com ([131.174.33.98] verified) by mail.tffenterprises.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.7) with ESMTP-TLS id 6868926 for cgpsa-discuss@tff.cs.caltech.edu; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:02:53 -0800 Received: from [64.215.224.70] (HELO wcg.org) by mail.kindsoftware.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 1229139 for cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:02:50 +0100 Received: from [64.215.224.66] (account bret.miller@wcg.org) by wcg.org (CommuniGate Pro IMAP 4.1.6) with XMIT id 5552909 for cgpsa-discuss@mail.tffenterprises.com; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:02:46 -0800 Subject: RE: [CGPSA] Good Scan Rate Average Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:02:44 -0800 Message-Id: <25979e6c4a3576429074056173a33b3d@mail.wcg.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Thread-Topic: [CGPSA] Good Scan Rate Average Priority: Normal Importance: normal X-Priority: 3 Sensitivity: Normal Thread-Index: AcOvsgaqkXDLsrJTTi6qLwtOWVJNPg== From: "Bret Miller" To: "CGPSA Discussion List" Reply-To: "bret.miller@wcg.org" X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro MAPI Connector 1.0.71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > 16:36:41.39 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(66): * 1534 Identified non-spam > (0.9/4.5) for in 31.0 seconds > 16:37:13.30 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(69): * 1535 Identified non-spam > (-102.8/4.5) for in 32.0 seconds > 16:37:45.09 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) inp(63): * 1536 Identified spam > (12.5/4.5) for in 32.0 seconds > > Seems maybe a bit high to me, but I am new to this setup. If this is > high, what (if anything) can I do to drop the scan time? > We're running > OS X 10.2, CGPSA 1.2, SpamAssassin 2.55, CGPro 4.1. Mine runs just a few seconds (1 to 3 generally). I always highly suggest the upgrade to SA 2.60. It's wonderful. That said, you might want to try adding this to local.cf: rbl_timeout 5 There are a number of RBLs in SA 2.55 that have gone out of existence and SA will just end up waiting until the timeout value unless you disable them. I just decided that if it couldn't get a response quickly, I really didn't need the response that bad. Bret